Annals of Emergency Medicine – Emergency Severity Index

00:00
09:49
Sign in or subscribe to listen

No me gusta!

The flash player was unable to start. If you have a flash blocker then try unblocking the flash content - it should be visible below.

Nurses Edition Commentary

Lisa Chavez, RN and Kathy Garvin, RN
00:00
06:23

No me gusta!

The flash player was unable to start. If you have a flash blocker then try unblocking the flash content - it should be visible below.

Robert M. H. -

When considering putting a MD in Triage and a vertical process the “requirement” for a complete nursing assessment makes it impossible for us to see, treat, and discharge without this causing another bottleneck. Any comments and suggestions?

Thanks in advance,

HutHut

Jess Mason -

This is definitely a challenge and needs a coordinated effort. The way we do it at UCSF Fresno is basically:
-Patient walks in and checks in at registration window
-Patient goes one station over to get CC and vitals input by RN
-Patients get called to one of 5 "cubicles" where a doc or APP does the rapid medical exam, also staffed by an RN. They get their labs drawn and EKGs in this area.
-Patients triaged by provider to low acuity then go to a second lobby ("vertical" area b/c sitting in chairs)
-From this lobby they get called back to smaller areas either for examination rooms or to see a nurse to start medications, IVs, etc. Otherwise they wait here for imaging and to see a provider.

The bottleneck tends to be for patients waiting in the vertical area to see a provider. We figure, at least they have been briefly seen at this point and labs/imaging is started. Sometimes the bottleneck backs up to the cubicles.

I'm not sure that this is the answer, but this is how we have been doing it.

To join the conversation, you need to subscribe.

Sign up today for full access to all episodes and to join the conversation.