EM:RAP 2019 NovemberFull episode audio for MD edition220:08 min - 306 MB - M4AEM:RAP 2019 November German EditionDeutsche91:21 min - 126 MB - MP3EM:RAP 2019 November Canadian EditionCanadian33:22 min - 46 MB - MP3EM:RAP 2019 November Farsi EditionFarsi168:42 min - 232 MB - MP3EM:RAP 2019 November French EditionFrançais36:44 min - 50 MB - MP3EM:RAP 2019 November Aussie EditionAustralian29:14 min - 40 MB - MP3EM:RAP 2019 November Spanish EditionEspañol78:58 min - 108 MB - MP3EMRAP 2019 November Board Review Answers205 KB - PDFEMRAP 2019 November Board Review Questions497 KB - PDFEM:RAP 2019 November Individual MP3 FIles285 MB - ZIPEM:RAP 2019 November Written Summary313 KB - PDF
Greg N. - November 16, 2019 3:15 PM
To add clarity to the chart I write "HINTS negative WITH reassuring saccade"
Evie M. - November 21, 2019 2:47 AM
I think this is a great way to clarify - thanks!
Tyler B. - May 18, 2020 11:48 AM
I think it's best to just chart the actual findings for each part of the HINTS exam, ie
Head impulse testing is negative
Nystagmus is not present (or describe if it is present)
Test of skew is negative
That way it is very clear exactly what is happening with each part of the test. Since there are three parts of the test that is done, just document each part of the test.
Evie M. - May 20, 2020 2:25 PM
I like this, and would add some clarification for the head impulse test, such as: "head impulse test is negative, with reassuring catch up saccade", or "head impulse suggests peripheral etiology" I find that using the terms "negative" and "positive" still creates some ambiguity with HINTS so its always a good idea to clarify.