The FDA has granted emergency use authorization (EUA) to two new oral antiviral medications targeting SARS-CoV2: Paxlovid (Pfizer) and molnupiravir (Merck).
Paxlovidcontains both nirmatrelvir (protease inhibitor) and ritonavir (pharmacokinetic booster).
A Pfizer press release touts an 88% relative reduction in hospitalization.
Data not yet published.
Approved for patients > 12 and at least 40 kg.
Treatment consists of 2 x 150 mg nirmatrelvir tabs + 1 x 100 mg ritonavir tablets (eg, 3 pills total) given twice daily for 5 days
Contraindications
Hypersensitivity to either component.
Severe renal/hepatic impairment.
Ritonavir is a strong P450 enzyme inhibitor (required to increase nirmatrelvir concentrations).
PITFALLS
There are many medications (at least 28) that are contraindicated with Paxlovid therapy including simvastatin, sildenafil and phenytoin.
Even more medications include warnings for use with Paxlovid, including warfarin and rivaroxaban, methadone, and a variety of immunomodulators.
Molnupiraviris a ribonucleoside prodrug.
Molnupiravirhas demonstrated a 30% relative reduction in hospitalization.
Treatment consists of 4 x 200mg molunpiravir tabs (eg, 800 mg) twice daily for 5 days.
PITFALLS
Molnupiravir appears to be a teratogen
Avoid in pregnancy.
Breastfeeding is not recommended until 4 days after conclusion of course.
Men are advised not to cause pregnancy for 3 months after use.
Both agents appear to be well tolerated.
The most common adverse effects are GI upset, malaise, and dizziness, which overlap with the symptoms of COVID.
Who should get these drugs?
Not accounting for scarcity or contraindications, the EUA approval indications are relatively broad:
Positive test for SARS-CoV-2
Symptomatic for 5 days or fewer
High risk for progression to severe disease
Does not require hospitalization
PERSPECTIVES
The goal is to avoid treating people who would do well regardless, and catch high risk patients in the viral replication phase of their illness, which presumably is when the drugs are effective, prior to the need for hospitalization.
Who is at high risk of progression? The CDC maintains a list of high risk conditions that predispose to severe illness from COVID. It is relatively broad and includes cancer, disease of any major organ (heart, lung, liver, kidney, brain), diabetes, mood disorders like depression, high BMI, pregnancy, smoking or other substance use.
Priority Recommendations
Because these medications are currently scarce, New York State, for example, suggests reserving Paxlovid for patients who are moderately to severely immunocompromised, or, those that are unvaccinated, over 65, with at least 1 additional risk factor for severe illness.
The latest NIH guidelines recommend these therapies in order of preference: Paxlovid, sotrovimab, remdesivir, and finally molnupiravir.
During supply shortages shouldn't we limit these to *unvaccinated* high-risk patients? The studies done on the unvaxxed. The already vaxxed should be considerated relatively low risk for hospitalization/death.
There seems to be decent evidence for inhaled steroids in the treatment of COVID (including this https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S0140-6736%2821%2901744-X). However this is prohibitive due to cost. I have been trying to think of ways to decrease cost for these therapies and realized that steroid nasal sprays are $10-20 at most pharmacy locations. The cap of these allows for a 18 gauge needle to pass through and facilitates capture of the liquid when pumped. When mixed with a saline bullet this nebulizes well.
For Fluticasone 50 mcg/spray it takes 1.1 mL to get about 440 mcg For Budesonide 32 mcg/spray it takes 1.75 mL to get 800 mcg
Nebulizers are available online for $40 to $60. Fluticasone is less expensive OTC and requires less volume. A single bottle would allow BID dosing for 7 days meaning for about $50 a patient could use this completely OTC strategy and based on the data hopefully decrease ED visits and Hospitalizations.
Do you know if anyone is doing this? I'd love to hear the thoughts from the EM:RAP COVID and Pharm experts!
Seems like data on inhaled steroids is mostly in terms of reducing cough - small benefit. No real reduction in terms of hospitalization or other important outcomes. I think if the patient's cough is really bad, this is a reasonable intervention (costs aside)
With paxlovid and "non-recommended" drugs such as calcium channel blockers,warfarin etc can we reduce these drugs by say 1/2 or what is the recommendation. Obviously with warfarin following the INR. Also if dose reduction is the recommendation, how long after the 5 day course should the reduction be continued (additional 24 hrs????). The warning by not contraindicated meds don't give any guidance.
Hi Andrew, this is one of several thorny issues for prescribers. There is no guidance I'm aware of and I doubt there will be any guidance that applies broadly–the decision to hold or reduce a drug dose is going to depend on the individual patient and drug. For example, discontinuing a statin is probably not a big problem but discontinuing warfarin potentially is, and might be best done in collaboration with the patient's other clinicians.
To join the conversation, you need to subscribe.
Sign up today for full access to all episodes and to join the conversation.
glenn b. - January 6, 2022 2:22 PM
During supply shortages shouldn't we limit these to *unvaccinated* high-risk patients? The studies done on the unvaxxed. The already vaxxed should be considerated relatively low risk for hospitalization/death.
Reuben Strayer (@emupdates) - January 6, 2022 4:02 PM
That is what the New York State guidelines I mentioned recommend. Here are the prioritization criteria NYS has come up with:
https://coronavirus.health.ny.gov/system/files/documents/2021/12/prioritization_of_mabs_during_resource_shortages_20211223_1000_0.pdf
Ryan A. - January 7, 2022 2:48 AM
As of this writing, whenever I click on the "full image" button I get an "access denied" error.
Reuben Strayer (@emupdates) - January 7, 2022 6:25 AM
try:
emupdates.com/paxlovid
tom f. - January 9, 2022 12:59 AM
Hello Reuben!
Excellent review. Short, clear, concise, informative, Brooklyn-like.
Hope all is not too chaotic at Maimonides.
tom fiero,
Merced.
Ps; i finally caught covid last week
Ky H. - January 11, 2022 2:14 PM
Thank you for this update.
Michael O. - January 13, 2022 3:35 PM
There seems to be decent evidence for inhaled steroids in the treatment of COVID (including this https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S0140-6736%2821%2901744-X). However this is prohibitive due to cost. I have been trying to think of ways to decrease cost for these therapies and realized that steroid nasal sprays are $10-20 at most pharmacy locations. The cap of these allows for a 18 gauge needle to pass through and facilitates capture of the liquid when pumped. When mixed with a saline bullet this nebulizes well.
For Fluticasone 50 mcg/spray it takes 1.1 mL to get about 440 mcg
For Budesonide 32 mcg/spray it takes 1.75 mL to get 800 mcg
Nebulizers are available online for $40 to $60. Fluticasone is less expensive OTC and requires less volume. A single bottle would allow BID dosing for 7 days meaning for about $50 a patient could use this completely OTC strategy and based on the data hopefully decrease ED visits and Hospitalizations.
Do you know if anyone is doing this? I'd love to hear the thoughts from the EM:RAP COVID and Pharm experts!
Thanks!!
Mel H. - January 13, 2022 3:59 PM
Michael I will ask Sean Nordt and the team about it
Anand S. - January 13, 2022 4:03 PM
Seems like data on inhaled steroids is mostly in terms of reducing cough - small benefit. No real reduction in terms of hospitalization or other important outcomes. I think if the patient's cough is really bad, this is a reasonable intervention (costs aside)
Andrew A. - January 19, 2022 9:52 AM
Reuben,
With paxlovid and "non-recommended" drugs such as calcium channel blockers,warfarin etc can we reduce these drugs by say 1/2 or what is the recommendation. Obviously with warfarin following the INR. Also if dose reduction is the recommendation, how long after the 5 day course should the reduction be continued (additional 24 hrs????). The warning by not contraindicated meds don't give any guidance.
Reuben Strayer (@emupdates) - January 19, 2022 10:01 AM
Hi Andrew, this is one of several thorny issues for prescribers. There is no guidance I'm aware of and I doubt there will be any guidance that applies broadly–the decision to hold or reduce a drug dose is going to depend on the individual patient and drug. For example, discontinuing a statin is probably not a big problem but discontinuing warfarin potentially is, and might be best done in collaboration with the patient's other clinicians.