Pape Chase 3 – qSOFA vs SIRS vs Sepsis

00:00
05:02
Sign in or subscribe to listen

No me gusta!

The flash player was unable to start. If you have a flash blocker then try unblocking the flash content - it should be visible below.

Nurses Edition Commentary

Lisa Chavez, RN and Kathy Garvin, RN
00:00
01:20

No me gusta!

The flash player was unable to start. If you have a flash blocker then try unblocking the flash content - it should be visible below.

Nathan G. -

The statements "Sepsis is considered a score of 2 or more" and " A score of 2 meets the criteria for sepsis" in regards to qSOFA are not accurate. The Sepsis-3 publications as well as the Sepsis-3 response document published by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign state very clearly that qSOFA DOES NOT define sepsis. It is merely a risk stratification tool and may be used as a prompt to consider the possibility of sepsis. Currently the SEP-1 CMS core measure still employs the old SIRS-based definitions of sepsis thus clinicians in the US are not likely to encounter administrative pressure to document in Sepsis-3-consistent language until this changes. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27894635

SHIH-CHIN C. -

2018 CMS SEP-1 uses Sepsis-2, Infection + 2 SIRS + 1 Organ dysfunction.
The studies linked below paints a less favorable view of qSOFA:
https://emcrit.org/pulmcrit/sepsis-3-sofa-validation-news/

To join the conversation, you need to subscribe.

Sign up today for full access to all episodes and to join the conversation.